Abortion InfoNet Message Board

Message Index

Welcome!

Messages Posted

Within the Last 2 Week(s) 225 of 228 Messages Displayed (Mixed Threaded Listing)

Reposting: A question of equality. (views: 22) — JR — Friday, 1 December 2000, at 1:07 p.m.
Re: Reposting: A question of equality. (views: 1) — Mammabear — Friday, 1 December 2000, at 5:38 p.m.
This one’s a hoot!! (views: 18) — Mammabear — Friday, 1 December 2000, at 11:47 a.m.
Re: This one’s a hoot!! (views: 19) — Stacy — Friday, 1 December 2000, at 12:14 p.m.
?? (views: 17) — smokey — Friday, 1 December 2000, at 5:19 a.m.
Re: ?? (views: 15) — Mammabear — Friday, 1 December 2000, at 6:13 a.m.
Re: ?? (views: 18) — anne — Friday, 1 December 2000, at 7:26 a.m.
PRO-LIFE ALL THE WAY (views: 25) — Mary — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 6:54 p.m.
PRO CHOICE ALL THE WAY (views: 26) — Rosie — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 8:28 p.m.
I disagree (views: 17) — Jeff — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 10:45 p.m.
Re: I disagree (views: 18) — Rosie — Friday, 1 December 2000, at 3:00 a.m.
Re: I disagree (views: 6) — Jeff — Friday, 1 December 2000, at 12:18 p.m.
Re: PRO CHOICE ALL THE WAY (views: 11) — jerry — Friday, 1 December 2000, at 10:21 a.m.
Consequences (views: 29) — Jeff — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 3:26 p.m.
WOMB, WOMB, WOMB (views: 27) — christal — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 4:54 p.m.
Re: WOMB, WOMB, WOMB (views: 21) — Jeff — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 5:31 p.m.
Re: WOMB, WOMB, WOMB (views: 22) — back ( g.n.) — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 6:02 p.m.
Re: WOMB, WOMB, WOMB (views: 8) — christal — Friday, 1 December 2000, at 10:15 a.m.
Re: WOMB, WOMB, WOMB (views: 8) — jerry — Friday, 1 December 2000, at 10:29 a.m.
Hello, ET! (views: 17) — anne — Friday, 1 December 2000, at 6:04 a.m.
Re: Interesting article (views: 14) — Jeanne — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 12:31 p.m.
Re: Interesting article (views: 8) — Ghost — Friday, 1 December 2000, at 3:30 p.m.
Re: Interesting article (views: 7) — Mammabear — Friday, 1 December 2000, at 4:08 p.m.
Re: I sure do (views: 8) — Jeanne — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 12:04 p.m.
Re: I sure do remember! (views: 7) — Mammabear — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 1:49 p.m.
Re: I sure do remember! (views: 8) — Jeff — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 2:46 p.m.
a final word on this subject (views: 25) — cire — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 7:55 a.m.
Re: a final word on this subject (views: 5) — jerry — Friday, 1 December 2000, at 10:40 a.m.
A note on religion (views: 35) — AIN Albert — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 7:21 a.m.
Re: A note on religion (views: 28) — Mammabear — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 8:45 a.m.
Re: A note on religion (views: 24) — Stacy — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 9:07 a.m.
Re: A note on religion (views: 17) — roxxychic — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 4:51 p.m.
OH! i get it, if it’s not all about the USA…. (views: 14) — Mammabear — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 6:50 a.m.
Re: OH! i get it, if it’s not all about the USA… (views: 5) — Jeff — Friday, 1 December 2000, at 3:22 p.m.
All That Stuff And More… (views: 11) — Scuzz… — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 3:53 a.m.
Re: Who’s going to raise all these babies? (views: 21) — Proudly Pro Life JP Freeman — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 3:20 a.m.
Re: Who’s going to raise all these babies? (views: 18) — Renee — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 11:09 a.m.
Re: Who’s going to raise all these babies? (views: 15) — Proudly Pro Life JP Freeman — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 6:14 p.m.
Opinions (views: 42) — Jeff — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 10:23 p.m.
questions (for anyone doing papers) (views: 29) — keb — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 10:44 p.m.
Could use some help (views: 23) — Jeff — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 12:54 p.m.
Re: Could use some help (views: 15) — Mammabear — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 2:02 p.m.
Re: Could use some help (views: 15) — Jeff — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 2:25 p.m.
Misinterpretation? (views: 13) — anne — Friday, 1 December 2000, at 5:57 a.m.
Re: Misinterpretation? (views: 7) — Jeff — Friday, 1 December 2000, at 12:22 p.m.
Re: Opinions (views: 14) — roxxychic — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 5:11 p.m.
Thank you (views: 12) — Jeff — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 5:36 p.m.
not just any old Trojan horse either. (views: 13) — Mammabear — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 5:53 p.m.
Re: not just any old Trojan horse either. (views: 10) — Jeff — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 10:12 p.m.
Re: not just any old Trojan horse either. (views: 4) — jerry — Friday, 1 December 2000, at 10:54 a.m.
Re: Thank you (views: 1) — roxxychic — Friday, 1 December 2000, at 5:37 p.m.
Opinion (views: 10) — keb — Friday, 1 December 2000, at 6:29 a.m.
Re: Opinion (views: 6) — Jeff — Friday, 1 December 2000, at 1:46 p.m.
Re: Opinions (views: 14) — Anne — Friday, 1 December 2000, at 8:54 a.m.
Re: Opinions (views: 13) — jerry — Friday, 1 December 2000, at 11:35 a.m.
Re: Opinions (views: 11) — Mammabear — Friday, 1 December 2000, at 11:59 a.m.
Re: Opinions (views: 8) — Stacy — Friday, 1 December 2000, at 12:26 p.m.
Re: Opinions and my mistake (views: 10) — Mammabear — Friday, 1 December 2000, at 12:44 p.m.
Re: Opinions and my mistake (views: 7) — Stacy — Friday, 1 December 2000, at 12:47 p.m.
Re: Opinions (views: 6) — Jeff — Friday, 1 December 2000, at 3:39 p.m.
Re: Opinions and phd’s (views: 4) — Mammabear — Friday, 1 December 2000, at 4:17 p.m.
Re: Opinions (again) (views: 6) — Mammabear — Friday, 1 December 2000, at 3:19 p.m.
Re: Dangers of Abortion vs. Birth (views: 10) — Melanie — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 8:42 p.m.
Re: Who’s going to raise all these babies? (views: 15) — Melanie — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 8:20 p.m.
Re: Who’s going to raise all these babies? (views: 13) — Renee — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 11:15 a.m.
Re: Who’s going to raise all these babies? (views: 14) — Melanie — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 11:58 a.m.
Re: Who’s going to raise all these babies? (views: 15) — Renee — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 1:27 p.m.
Re: Who’s going to raise all these babies? (views: 8) — Melanie — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 6:30 p.m.
Re: Abortion why (views: 7) — jerry — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 7:54 p.m.
Re: Abortion why (views: 5) — Stacy — Friday, 1 December 2000, at 12:21 p.m.
I need a definition of pro-life… (views: 39) — Jenny Cummings — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 7:30 p.m.
Re: I need a definition of pro-life… (views: 37) — Mammabear — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 7:55 p.m.
Re: I need a definition of pro-life… (views: 23) — Jenny Cummings — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 10:45 p.m.
wrong feet (views: 21) — keb — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 11:18 p.m.
Re: wrong feet (views: 18) — Jenny Cummings — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 11:51 p.m.
both feet (views: 15) — keb — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 12:35 a.m.
Re: wrong feet (views: 11) — Melanie — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 12:01 p.m.
OOPS; I need a definition of pro-life… (views: 13) — Mammabear — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 4:49 a.m.
down the board (views: 20) — keb — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 10:00 p.m.
you mention common ground, eh? (views: 11) — Mammabear — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 6:20 p.m.
Article (views: 9) — Jeff — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 10:30 p.m.
Re: Article (views: 8) — Mammabear — Friday, 1 December 2000, at 6:05 a.m.
Re: you mention common ground, eh? (views: 3) — JR — Friday, 1 December 2000, at 4:16 p.m.
Re: you mention common ground, eh? (views: 2) — Mammabear — Friday, 1 December 2000, at 4:50 p.m.
Re: I need a definition of pro-life… (views: 14) — Jeff — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 10:17 p.m.
Re: Labels (views: 9) — jerry — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 6:01 p.m.
Re: The Human Soul (views: 9) — Jeff — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 5:42 p.m.
Re: The Human Soul (views: 7) — Michael Colon — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 7:18 a.m.
Re: The Human Soul (views: 6) — Jeff — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 1:16 p.m.
Most of you guys are nuts! (views: 41) — Renee — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 4:56 p.m.
Re: Most of you guys are nuts! (views: 27) — Martha2Mary — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 5:14 p.m.
Those precious tax $$$ and hypocritical lifers… (views: 23) — Scuzz… — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 3:32 a.m.
Re: Those precious tax $$$ and hypocritical lifers (views: 15) — Martha2Mary — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 11:27 a.m.
with you (views: 10) — keb — Friday, 1 December 2000, at 7:33 a.m.
Re: Most of you guys are nuts! (views: 17) — Jeff — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 6:03 p.m.
Re: Most of you guys are nuts! (views: 17) — Jenny Cummings — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 7:22 p.m.
Re: Most of you guys are nuts! (views: 14) — Jeff — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 10:04 p.m.
Re: Most of you guys are nuts! (views: 15) — Scuzz… — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 2:44 a.m.
Re: Most of you guys are nuts! (views: 12) — Jeff — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 1:07 p.m.
what you propose is nuts! (views: 11) — Mammabear — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 3:33 p.m.
Re: what you propose is nuts! (views: 8) — Jeff — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 3:47 p.m.
Re: what you propose is nuts! (views: 7) — christal — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 4:47 p.m.
Re: what you propose is nuts! (views: 8) — Jeff — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 5:41 p.m.
Re: what you propose is nuts! (views: 2) — christal — Friday, 1 December 2000, at 3:54 p.m.
Re: what you propose is nuts! (views: 6) — Jeff — Friday, 1 December 2000, at 4:12 p.m.
Re: what you propose is nuts! (views: 3) — Mammabear — Friday, 1 December 2000, at 5:20 p.m.
Re: what you propose is nuts! (views: 1) — Jeff — Friday, 1 December 2000, at 5:48 p.m.
Re: Most of you guys are nuts! (views: 13) — JR — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 10:56 a.m.
Re: Most of you guys are nuts! (views: 18) — Michael Colon — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 7:39 a.m.
Re: Most of you guys are nuts! (views: 8) — Renee — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 3:30 p.m.
Above post to be directed to Michael, not JR *NM* (views: 3) — Renee — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 3:32 p.m.
Re: Most of you guys are nuts! (views: 6) — Michael Colon — Friday, 1 December 2000, at 7:00 a.m.
Tax dollars at work… (views: 6) — anne — Friday, 1 December 2000, at 9:42 a.m.
Re: Tax dollars at work… (views: 8) — JR — Friday, 1 December 2000, at 11:57 a.m.
Just curious………….. (views: 15) — Martha2Mary — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 3:00 p.m.
Re: Just curious………….. (views: 10) — christal — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 3:13 p.m.
Re: Just curious………….. (views: 11) — Martha2Mary — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 3:28 p.m.
Re: Just curious………….. (views: 8) — christal — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 4:32 p.m.
Re: Just curious………….. (views: 13) — Martha2Mary — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 4:59 p.m.
Nah (views: 14) — The Queen Mum — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 9:15 p.m.
Re: Abortion why (views: 6) — christal — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 2:58 p.m.
reconciliation… (views: 5) — cire — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 3:07 p.m.
Re: reconciliation… (views: 5) — christal — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 3:21 p.m.
Re: Disgusting Photos (views: 11) — Michael Colon — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 2:13 p.m.
Problems with Disgusting Photos (views: 13) — christal — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 3:27 p.m.
Re: Problems with Disgusting Photos (views: 13) — Eileen — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 4:38 p.m.
Re: Problems with Disgusting Photos (views: 10) — Michael Colon — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 5:49 p.m.
proven…unproven…whatever (views: 12) — victoria — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 7:25 p.m.
Re: proven…unproven…whatever (views: 12) — Michael Colon — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 7:00 a.m.
Re: free will (views: 5) — Michael Colon — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 2:11 p.m.
Re: free will (views: 4) — cire — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 2:18 p.m.
Re: free will (views: 6) — Michael Colon — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 2:54 p.m.
it’s all good… *NM* (views: 2) — cire — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 3:03 p.m.
Re: um, keep in mind that… (views: 8) — christal — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 2:07 p.m.
um, again (views: 9) — cire — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 2:15 p.m.
Re: it’s nothing personal (views: 4) — Michael Colon — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 2:00 p.m.
Re: Tired of playing ‘ring around the rosy’. (views: 11) — Michael Colon — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 1:49 p.m.
Re: Disgusting Photos (views: 13) — Michael Colon — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 1:47 p.m.
it takes a lot more than a dead body… (views: 5) — AdrenalineJunky — Friday, 1 December 2000, at 10:17 a.m.
Re: really interesting discussions (views: 8) — Mammabear — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 1:42 p.m.
Re: demonstration debate (views: 6) — JR — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 1:36 p.m.
Re: demonstration debate (views: 7) — anne — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 3:53 p.m.
hmmm (views: 12) — cire — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 1:33 p.m.
What’s opening the ‘parachute’ analogous to? NT *NM* (views: 4) — Eileen — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 1:43 p.m.
007 (views: 8) — cire — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 1:49 p.m.
False analogy (views: 12) — Eileen — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 1:59 p.m.
riiiiight (views: 10) — cire — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 2:03 p.m.
You’ve heard it before – (views: 9) — Eileen — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 3:12 p.m.
My Perfect Analogy about risking pregnancy… (views: 11) — Scuzz… — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 4:08 a.m.
Save me! I’m turning into Estil! (views: 14) — Scuzz… — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 4:10 a.m.
Re: I sure do (views: 26) — Stacy — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 1:21 p.m.
Re: I sure do (views: 16) — JR — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 1:28 p.m.
I can hear it JR (views: 16) — Eileen — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 1:36 p.m.
proof is in the pudding (views: 28) — victoria — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 1:37 p.m.
mmm… i like vanilla pudding (views: 11) — cire — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 1:46 p.m.
Re: proof is in the pudding (views: 15) — Stacy — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 2:54 p.m.
Re: proof is in the pudding (views: 16) — victoria — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 4:21 p.m.
Re: proof is in the pudding (views: 9) — Stacy — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 7:46 a.m.
Re: proof is in the pudding (views: 12) — Martha2Mary — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 12:30 p.m.
Re: proof is in the pudding (views: 7) — Mammabear — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 12:39 p.m.
Re: proof is in the pudding (views: 10) — Stacy — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 12:48 p.m.
churches (views: 6) — keb — Friday, 1 December 2000, at 7:05 a.m.
sheesh – (views: 16) — “kebab” — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 8:51 p.m.
Re: sheesh – (views: 10) — Stacy — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 4:47 a.m.
not that it really matters, but… (views: 9) — victoria — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 6:26 a.m.
anyhoo (views: 6) — keb — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 3:57 p.m.
just one thing (views: 7) — cire — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 3:00 p.m.
Re: proof is in the pudding (views: 11) — anne — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 4:23 p.m.
my mother the martyr (views: 10) — victoria — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 6:49 p.m.
Re: my mother the martyr (views: 3) — JR — Friday, 1 December 2000, at 12:21 p.m.
standing ovation! (views: 15) — cire — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 1:38 p.m.
I’m standing with you *NM* *NM* (views: 2) — Jeanne — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 12:10 p.m.
Re: I sure do (views: 18) — Mammabear — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 2:11 p.m.
Re: I sure do (views: 15) — Michael Colon — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 2:39 p.m.
Re: I sure do (views: 13) — Mammabear — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 3:12 p.m.
Re: I sure do (views: 10) — Michael Colon — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 5:46 p.m.
Re: I sure do (views: 10) — Mammabear — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 7:05 p.m.
Re: I sure do (views: 8) — Michael Colon — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 7:15 a.m.
sarcasm mode on (views: 13) — cire — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 2:52 p.m.
Re: sarcasm mode on (views: 10) — Mammabear — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 3:32 p.m.
Re: sarcasm mode on (views: 9) — cire — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 5:31 p.m.
Re: sarcasm mode on (views: 9) — Mammabear — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 6:18 p.m.
catholicism +antisemitism (views: 9) — cire — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 10:32 p.m.
Re: sarcasm mode on (views: 13) — Stacy — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 4:57 a.m.
To both Stacy and cire (views: 16) — Mammabear — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 5:15 a.m.
Re: To the ignorant (views: 18) — Eileen — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 5:49 a.m.
Re: To the ignorant (views: 15) — Stacy — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 6:36 a.m.
I was wrong. (views: 17) — Stacy — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 6:39 a.m.
Re: I was wrong. (views: 13) — Mammabear — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 7:08 a.m.
Re: I was wrong. (views: 11) — Stacy — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 7:49 a.m.
Re: I sure do (views: 14) — Stacy — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 2:53 p.m.
Re: I sure do (views: 13) — Mammabear — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 3:54 p.m.
Re: I sure do (views: 8) — Stacy — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 4:52 a.m.
um, Stacey… (views: 12) — victoria — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 7:04 p.m.
Re: um, Stacey… (views: 9) — Mammabear — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 7:58 p.m.
Re: um, Stacey… (views: 12) — Stacy — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 4:55 a.m.
Re: um, Stacey… (views: 9) — victoria — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 6:35 a.m.
The answer may be easier MamaBear (views: 10) — Eileen — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 3:41 p.m.
Re: The answer may be easier MamaBear (views: 9) — Mammabear — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 4:07 p.m.
Re: I sure do (views: 12) — anne — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 4:08 p.m.
Re: point of info (views: 5) — victoria — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 1:20 p.m.
mainly in agreement (views: 6) — keb — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 2:18 p.m.
To Stacey re:Annex (views: 13) — Mammabear — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 1:14 p.m.
Re: but of course (views: 8) — JR — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 1:12 p.m.
exactly (views: 8) — keb — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 1:59 p.m.
duty to rescue (views: 8) — victoria — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 1:12 p.m.
not hard at all (views: 6) — keb — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 1:53 p.m.
Re: Logic (views: 10) — cire — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 1:10 p.m.
tsk, cire (views: 16) — keb — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 1:39 p.m.
i love being catholic (views: 10) — cire — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 2:06 p.m.
Eileen?? over to you *NM* (views: 9) — keb — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 2:24 p.m.
gotta love tag-team debating… *NM* (views: 5) — cire — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 2:42 p.m.
Unfortunately being catholic (views: 12) — Eileen — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 8:33 p.m.
we-e-ll-ll (views: 12) — keb — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 9:35 p.m.
sex (views: 10) — cire — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 11:07 a.m.
Re: Logic (views: 11) — anne — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 3:31 p.m.
Much needed 411 (views: 12) — roxxychic — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 8:29 p.m.
Remember you’re unique – like everyone else!! (views: 19) — Eileen — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 9:14 p.m.
By George! It’s a human being! (views: 9) — roxxychic — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 4:24 p.m.
Send in the clones (views: 8) — anne — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 4:59 p.m.
Remember (views: 8) — cire — Friday, 1 December 2000, at 9:30 a.m.
Re: Remember; this is rediculous!! (views: 5) — Mammabear — Friday, 1 December 2000, at 11:27 a.m.
Biology (views: 8) — Anne — Thursday, 30 November 2000, at 5:05 p.m.
taking one’s own advice? 😉 (views: 17) — keb — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 1:05 p.m.
Re: taking one’s own advice? 😉 (views: 16) — Martha2Mary — Wednesday, 29 November 2000, at 2:51 p.m.